The world of college hockey is buzzing with discussions surrounding various NCAA rule changes, including transfer rules, NIL money (name, image, and likeness rights), Alston money (full cost of attendance), and the potential reclassification of athletes as employees. However, while college hockey enthusiasts are unable to influence those matters, they do have a say in the conference realignment that is currently up for debate.
In the previous offseason, much emphasis was placed on Atlantic Hockey and the need for its expansion or division into two conferences. Unfortunately, selfish motives have hindered the necessary progress in this regard, and the issue remains unresolved.
Similarly, selfishness and greed come into play within the National Collegiate Hockey Conference (NCHC). Talks among NCHC representatives have intensified regarding the inclusion of Arizona State as a member, although it remains uncertain whether any definitive decisions will be reached soon.
Rumors circulate that the NCHC is deliberating on how to address Miami University before making a determination about Arizona State. There have long been speculations that Miami might depart for the Central Collegiate Hockey Association (CCHA), and it appears the university is finally giving serious consideration to this move. The program’s struggles in the NCHC, coupled with the departure of key players like Ludvig Persson and Red Savage, have amplified the notion that Miami should explore the viable option available in the CCHA.
However, there is an obstacle in the form of a $1 million exit fee.
This is where selflessness becomes crucial.
NCHC officials, comprising athletic directors and school presidents from member institutions, should do the right thing and waive Miami’s exit fee. A simple and amicable farewell, coupled with well-wishes for their future endeavors, would suffice without any financial strings attached.
In terms of financial impact, the NCHC will receive an entrance fee from Arizona State that will offset any loss resulting from Miami’s departure. Furthermore, the exit fee was never meant to be a means of ransom or a punitive measure driven by greed. Its purpose was to discourage schools from constantly shifting conferences solely for better financial deals. However, Miami’s case is different; they seek a new conference to regroup and compete. Moreover, the NCHC already has a replacement ready to fill the void.
If NCHC teams are unwilling to act in this manner, or if Miami prefers to stay, an alternative solution would be to operate with nine teams—a situation that should not impede progress in any way.
Arizona State has proven its worthiness to be welcomed into the NCHC, and any hesitance or inertia should not hinder this decision. It is essential to be a responsible steward by allowing Miami to pursue its desired path. This arrangement would result in a well-rounded CCHA with ten teams, while the NCHC would maintain its equilibrium with eight teams.
In the end, everyone benefits, except for the school that misses out on Miami’s $1 million exit fee—though divided among seven institutions, it is merely a nominal amount. Let’s prioritize progress and cooperation over pocket change.
